I cannot remember
when I first learned what we Presbyterians call "the doctrines of
grace." I only remember that it was
a tremendous relief when I did. The
"doctrines of grace" is the knowledge that God loves me just the way
I am, that He showed it by dying on the
Cross for me, even when I didn't deserve it. I don't have to prove anything to
God for Him to love me--He already does. I don't have to choose Him--He chose
me. I don't have to be good enough to
earn His favor--He already is better than good enough for both of us. His
death on the Cross gave me complete forgiveness for everything I've done
wrong, and for those unfortunate,
wayward tendencies which make up so much of my psyche. God is a forgiving
Father, who keeps taking me back no matter how much I embarrass Him, or fail
His instructions. He loves me, and that
is a good thing.
The doctrines of
Grace liberates me from shame and the from the tyranny of perfectionism. God simultaneously sets the bar of perfection
too high for me to reach and acceptance too low for me to miss it. In this, God is like my wife who loves me
even when I act like a jerk and dress like a hobo. Her love is not affected by my many failures, and neither is
God's.
Yet as satisfying as
grace may be, there remains a nagging disquietude. Deep down, I'm not that good of a guy. I may be forgiven, but that doesn't make me right.
The grace, at least
as it is sometimes understood, is that it gets at the punishment but not the
cause. Sure we are forgiven, but are we
changed? Suppose I were an alcoholic, and
God were to say me " That's okay, son. I forgive you for
drinking," That would be good, but
I can still be a slave to drinking. Even
if my drinking had no direct punishment, it could till wreak havoc on my
life. Forgiveness, however wonderful, is
no answer without change.
This sets up a
conundrum. If our relationship with God demands change, that implies there must
be a standard of living, a law, that defines the way ought to live. If there is a law, then I am under it. If I
am under it, then I ought to be ashamed and feel guilty when I break it. I
cannot be guilty and not guilty at the same time. How, can grace and the Law coexist? Yet they do coexist somehow.
More
specifically, how can I both believe in
doing the right thing, and believe I don't have to do the right thing? How can we
live with God, ourselves and others, seeking to please Him, yet failing
at every turn to do it right?
I cannot say that
I have fully grasped intellectually or
experientially this paradox, but I can say that may have found a way around it
that preserves my freedom and leads me to live a better life
It lies in the habits of the heart.
Most of what we do
in life we never think very little about. We do them automatically by learned
instinct. This ability of human beings
to do repetitive tasks or to make repetitive judgments is called habit. Habits carry the force of momentum in the
mind--if we don't make a conscious effort to stop, we just keep doing
them. We act by habit without paying
attention. That is the purpose of
habits, to relieve our conscious mind of constant decision making by creating a
bank of premade decisions.
Habits do not always
happen by accident. We can make or break habits by the repetition of the same
small decision over and over. Have
devotions three or four days in a row, and it starts a habit. Oversleep for three or four days in a row,
and that becomes a habit, too.
Some habits are positive, such as kissing your wife good morning, while
some are negative, such at overeating,
gambling, or pornography. Once
they are formed, they draw us like iron
to a magnet.
Habits frequently
supersede the intentions of our heart.
They are, like Paul said, another law in our bodies, drawing us to do
thing our spirit says we should not do.
Habits are in many
ways are the opposite of laws.
Laws are imposed
from outside--habits exist on the inside. Laws are hard to keep--habits are
hard not to keep. Laws are enforced by
shame--habits are enforced by momentum. Laws are more of a burden the more we
have--habits are easier to follow the
more we have. Laws demand perfection--habits are about inclination.
Habits are like
gravity. Whether or not we defy them, they are still there, pulling us in one
direction or another.
Laws can become
habits. For example, we may be in the
habit of buckling our seat belts when we get in the car, when we also know it is the law we do so.
Once we get in the habit, we no longer worry about obeying . Once a law becomes a habit, it no longer
becomes a burden.
The intention of the
Law was to help us develop of the right kind of habits. We my no longer need to be told not to kill,
because we do not want to kill. We no
longer need to be told not to steal, because we don't want what other people
have. We
may not be under the threat of punishment, but we still need to make
good habits instead of bad ones.
This pursuit of good
habits is purely personal. Failure in
habits, at least at first, is to be
expected, but it doesn't need to stop us from trying. We don't stop trying to develop good eating
habits because we overindulged in a meal last week. We just get up and try
again. We don't stop talking to God
because missed devotions one morning--we just try again.
Whether we are
trapped in bad habits or failing at good habits, there is no habit which cannot
be changed with God's help. Paul says
that there is no sin which is not common to us, but God will with each
temptation give us a way of escape, so that we may be able to bear it. With God's help we can break every binding
habit.
I am grateful for
God's universal forgiveness in my life. I am also grateful that He can help me
develop positive change though positive habits . The struggle for sanctification is a struggle to develop new
habits. Change our habits and we change ourselves.
Great posting...I loved it
ReplyDeleteVal