Croegh Patrick is a
high mountain outside of Westport, Ireland. It is a stark majestic
mountain,
stunning in beauty and
majesty. Though we climbed only a few feet up the hill,
the view from the mountainside is
breathtaking.
But as beautiful as
the location is, the human grandeur of the place is even greater. According to
legend this was the place where St. Patrick imitated Jesus by fasting for forty
days and nights. Today thousands of people come there either as an adventure or
a spiritual pilgrimage to climb it--old and young, crippled and healthy. To some it's a holiday while others view it
as a spiritual quest. Many of the latter group climb it barefoot.
There's a mystery
here that neither the hikers nor the devout nor the even we critical
Protestants understand. Why did Patrick
do it? Why did our Lord Jesus, whom
Patrick was copying, go up on the Mount of Temptation in Israel? Even further,
why have people come here for over a thousand years to copy Patrick's journey?
None of the usual
explanations seem to me to explain it.
We Protestants often criticize it, seeing it as Catholics
trying to atone for their own sins through penitential suffering. There is some truth in this. There's a plaque
at the bottom that declares any Catholic who climbs this hill receives a plenary indulgence from the
Pope. We Protestants point
correctly that we don't need to climb a
mountain to find forgiveness--Jesus has already give us forgiveness. All we have to do is ask.
But let's not be so
quick to dismiss these pilgrims as guilty people who don't understand
forgiveness. Many of them walk it
joyfully, not guiltily. If it were just for penance, then why did St. Patrick
do it in the first place? Moreover, why
did Jesus (who knew no sin) climb a similar mountain and fast for forty days in
the New Testament? If' it is just for penance, how do we explain our Lord
fasting on a mountain?
It may be true for
some that they do it to attain forgiveness for sin and entrance into heaven. If
that were the reason, it would be pointless to atone for our own sins. If
someone paid the mortgage on the house, it would be foolish to spend the rest
of our lives continuing to pay for it. I
no longer have to pay for what is already bought. But I am convinced that most
intelligent Catholics understand this as much as Protestants do--and I am
certainly convinced that St. Patrick understood this, too. He didn't go up the
mountain to pay for what was already bought.
Some of my
Pentecostal friends suggest that the reason for this kind of fasting journey is
to attain spiritual power. They point to
passage where Jesus says that the some miracles come by much prayer and
fasting. They see this kind of
experience as charging up our spiritual
batteries to do miraculous works.
This explanation is
also troublesome. The Holy Spirit is not
a force like electricity. I don't have to "recharge my batteries" to
serve God. His power in me is infinite. My cell phone or computer has a finite amount
of charge, so I have to keep charging
them up. Only a small amount of charge will go into my batteries at one time. Isn't God in me capable of unlimited
power? The Holy Spirit lives and works
inside every Christian. I don't have to charge my faith like I charge up my
cell phone. Besides, this view doesn't
explain why Jesus, who was God and had infinite power, climbed a mountain
before He began His ministry, nor why Patrick who had already demonstrated
great Spiritual power in confronting the pagans of Ireland go and up the
mountain, interrupting a work that was already successfully begun.
Here's what I think
Patrick was doing up on Croegh Patrick.
He was imitating Jesus. Modern
believers do it in imitation of Jesus and Patrick. When we want to know someone we imitate what
they do. We don't practice prayer,
fasting, or any other good work because of the results it brings in others, but
because of the changes it brings in ourselves.
It wasn't to be forgiven, or to get the power to do anything. It was be
something--a simple imitator of Christ.
Part of the thrill
Ireland for me was walking in the steps of my
ancestors. To walk on their soil was way of getting in touch with them.
Fasting, prayer,
feeding the poor, and even Spiritual
journeys are to me a means of imitating Christ. I don't always know what I will
get out of them. I don't know why Jesus did what He did fully. But when I
imitate Him, I learn about Him. If Jesus found it helpful to go up a mountain
without food or comfort to serve the Father, who's to say it isn't helpful for
me? Jesus saw it as necessary to
regularly deny Himself comforts and pleasures of this life so He could focus on
the Father. His place in God was secure.
He didn't do it to earn the next life, but so as not to become too entangled in
this one. Patrick didn't climb that
mountain for the view, but for a place to encounter the Father.
As important as the
central Protestant doctrine of justification by faith is, it must also be
understood in balance. Jesus did everything for us--but does that mean we
should make no sacrifices for Him in return?
Merely sitting and looking up and admiring a mountain peak is great, but
not as great as climbing it. Looking up
at Christ on the Cross is awesome, but taking up our own cross and following
Him is greater. Those who climb that
mountain on sincere pilgrimage may or may do it for the wrong reasons but I'm
convinced that Patrick did it for better reasons. He did it because Jesus told him to follow,
and Jesus went up a mountain to fast, pray, and commune with the Father.
Near the base of
Croegh Patrick stand another kind of monument. It's a sculpture of a ship made
of human skeletons. It is a commemoration one of the "coffin ships"
that left Ireland due to the famine of 1847-1849. Millions of Irishmen died of starvation, and
millions more fled to America. One tenth of the Irishmen who left died in transit
What would have
happened if the Christians of Europe, those in England in particular, had not
looked for reasons but simply imitated Christ by practicing the Spiritual
discipline of charity? Many did, but not enough.
More than a million people, located a few
miles off the coast of what was then the most prosperous Christian nation on
earth,
died of starvation.
It was, at the time, part of their own
commonwealth, yet the Christians of England could not find it in their heart or
power to launch more serious relief efforts.
I'm sure they had
their motivations. But this may have been the problem We look for reasons when
instead we should be engaging in simple imitation. What would have happened if
the Christians of England and Ireland, Catholic and Protestant, had simply practiced
the spiritual discipline of fasting, and
sent some of what they saved to Ireland?
How much might have changed in Irish history if they had?
It may have been
hard to do it, to climb a mountain of
such incredible need. Many Christians
worked hard to feed them, especially those who ladled out life from the
"soup kettles" in the churches. But the imitation of Christ in all
things is an essential part of Christian spirituality. Christians sat back in their comfort and let
the people of Ireland starve.
It isn't an accident
that the sculpture of the coffin ship was placed near the base of Croegh
Patrick. The imitation of Christ is not just a personal journey. It involved
imitating Him in His love as well as in his purity. Maybe, instead of rejoicing in personal
salvation, they could have done more to imitate Christ their treatment of each other. I don't know the history of Ireland well enough
to know if this were true, but maybe it was.
If they had imitated Christ more then, the history of this country might
have been very different.